NEW DELHI: SC Monday agreed to examine a plea challenging the appointment of Unnat P Pandit as the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks. The petition filed by around 600 Group-A Patent officers is virtually a revolt by them against the Centre's decision to Pandit's appointment.
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal issued notices to Centre and Pandit seeking their response on allegation that his appointment was in violation of law & he was not qualified to hold the post.
Senior advocate P S Patwalia told the bench that it was a shocking case of backdoor appointment and sought the court's intervention, but his plea was opposed by Pandit's counsel who submitted that there was no breach of statutory law in his appointment. The court, after a brief hearing, asked the parties to file their response within four weeks.
The petition was filed by the All India Patent Officers' Welfare Association in SC after Delhi HC rejected its plea. HC had said the PIL cannot be entertained in service matters and closed the case. The association moved SC and challenged the appointment on grounds that Pandit was ineligible to be appointed to the post on deputation for five years and his appointment stood vitiated on account of an arbitrary selection process that was initiated without issuing any open advertisement as per mandate of the law.
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal issued notices to Centre and Pandit seeking their response on allegation that his appointment was in violation of law & he was not qualified to hold the post.
Senior advocate P S Patwalia told the bench that it was a shocking case of backdoor appointment and sought the court's intervention, but his plea was opposed by Pandit's counsel who submitted that there was no breach of statutory law in his appointment. The court, after a brief hearing, asked the parties to file their response within four weeks.
The petition was filed by the All India Patent Officers' Welfare Association in SC after Delhi HC rejected its plea. HC had said the PIL cannot be entertained in service matters and closed the case. The association moved SC and challenged the appointment on grounds that Pandit was ineligible to be appointed to the post on deputation for five years and his appointment stood vitiated on account of an arbitrary selection process that was initiated without issuing any open advertisement as per mandate of the law.
You may also like
Maharashtra Govt Seeks More Time to Frame Policy On Phasing Out Petrol, Diesel Vehicles Amid Pollution Concerns In Mumbai
Bombay HC Slams BMC For Inaction Since 2021, Orders Demolition Of Illegal Andheri Structure In 2 Weeks
Ahmedabad: Former APSEZ Official Sentenced To 5 Years RI For Amassing Disproportionate Assets
AP and Telangana Weather, April 22: Intense summer heat on Tuesday; caution advised
Mumbai News: Six KEM Hospital Doctors Accuse Senior Professor Of Sexual Harassment, FIR Registered